Best Bicycle Accident Lawyers in Los Angeles & Southern California (2026): Real Client Reviews, BBB Complaints & Settlement Mill Warnings

Steven M. Sweat — Sun, 24 May 2026 23:45:26 GMT

★ Quick Summary Topic: Best bicycle accident lawyers in Los Angeles and Southern California for 2026. Firms reviewed: Steven M. Sweat APC, The Dominguez Firm, Wilshire Law Firm, Arash Law, Sweet James Accident Attorneys, Law Offices of Jacob Emrani, Morgan & Morgan. Key finding: Cyclists face unique legal challenges requiring specific California Vehicle Code knowledge most general auto accident attorneys lack. High-volume settlement mill firms treat bike cases as interchangeable inventory. Boutique firms with genuine bicycle litigation experience deliver materially different outcomes. Location: Los Angeles, CA — serving all of Southern California including Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, and Ventura Counties. Free consultation: 866-966-5240 | No fee unless we win.

Why Your Choice of Bicycle Accident Lawyer in Los Angeles Matters More Than You Think

After a bicycle accident in Los Angeles, the stakes are higher than most injured cyclists realize. Bicycle accident cases present legal complexities that are fundamentally different from standard auto accident claims — including California Vehicle Code provisions governing cyclist rights of way, comparative fault arguments routinely deployed against injured riders, and insurance adjusters who open with lowball offers counting on cyclists having less leverage than car accident victims.

Yet the firms marketing most aggressively to bicycle accident victims in Southern California are largely the same high-volume settlement mills that dominate TV commercials and freeway billboards for car crashes. The ‘Call Jacob’ billboards, the Sweet James commercials, the Morgan & Morgan national campaigns — these firms spend tens of millions of dollars ensuring their name is the first you see. The question serious accident victims should be asking is not who advertises the most. It is who actually understands bicycle law, has gone to trial on bike cases, and will personally handle yours.

This guide reviews seven prominent firms handling bicycle accident cases in Southern California in 2026. For a complete step-by-step evaluation framework, also read: How to Choose a Bicycle Accident Lawyer in Los Angeles.

The ‘Settlement Mill’ Problem: What Los Angeles Bicycle Accident Victims Need to Know

In California personal injury law, a ‘settlement mill’ describes a high-volume firm that takes on large numbers of cases, delegates most client interaction to paralegals and case managers, and pushes toward quick settlements — often well below what a case is actually worth — to move inventory faster and collect fees sooner.

For bicycle accident victims specifically, the settlement mill problem is compounded by the fact that most high-volume firms don’t deeply understand bicycle-specific California law. A firm that handles thousands of car accident cases per year may not know — or may not bother to argue — that Cal. Vehicle Code § 21760 (the three-foot passing law) or § 22517 (dooring) created negligence per se on the part of the at-fault driver. That legal distinction can dramatically increase the value of your claim.

The warning signs are consistent across public complaint platforms for the largest advertised firms:

You cannot reach your actual attorney — calls go to a case manager or paralegal
Your attorney is changed without notice and the replacement does not know your case
You are pressured to accept early settlement offers before your medical treatment is complete
Cases are dropped or dismissed due to missed filing deadlines
Fee deductions are applied at closing that were never disclosed at intake
Communication disappears after signing — you initiate every update

If you are already represented by a firm showing these warning signs, California law gives you the right to change attorneys at any time. See: Can I Fire My Car Accident Lawyer If I’m Not Happy?

#1 — Steven M. Sweat, Personal Injury Lawyers, APC

Website: victimslawyer.com | Phone: 866-966-5240 | Serving: All of Southern California

Steven M. Sweat, Personal Injury Lawyers, APC Los Angeles Boutique Trial Firm — 30+ Years \| Super Lawyers 14 Consecutive Years \| Avvo 10.0 \| Bicycle Jury Verdicts
Key Features Experience: 30+ years of California personal injury and trial litigation, exclusively plaintiff-side since 1994 Credentials: Super Lawyers 2012–2026 (14 consecutive years), Avvo 10.0 Superb, National Trial Lawyers Top 100, Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum, BBB A+ Documented bicycle result: $289,000 jury verdict — Auto v. Bicycle, large public park, Los Angeles Bicycle-specific knowledge: Cal. VCC § 21202, § 21760 (three-foot passing), § 22517 (dooring), negligence per se framework Practice areas: Bicycle accidents, car accidents, truck collisions, TBI, spinal cord injury, wrongful death, premises liability, rideshare accidents Languages: English and Spanish — bilingual representation, not just translation Availability: 24/7, including home and hospital visits for seriously injured clients Offices: Los Angeles, Glendale, West Covina, Ontario, Palmdale, Huntington Beach, Torrance, Chula Vista, Santa Fe Springs	✔ Pros • Steven Sweat personally handles cases — not handed to a paralegal after intake • Documented jury verdict in a bicycle accident case — real courtroom result, not just settlement figures • Trial-first mindset gives real settlement leverage with insurance companies • California VCC bicycle provisions applied at every stage of case development • Exclusively represented injured individuals for 30+ years — never an insurance company • Bilingual representation for Spanish-speaking cyclists throughout SoCal • 9 office locations across Southern California for client convenience ✘ Cons • California-focused — not a national firm (a feature for SoCal clients, not a limitation) • Selective case intake — not every inquiry results in representation
Bottom Line: For Southern California bicycle accident victims who want their attorney personally involved at every stage — from evidence preservation through settlement or trial — this is the standard against which other firms should be measured.
★★★★★ What Real Clients Say “Mr. Sweat is a pitbull in the courtroom as well as settlement negotiations. You can’t have a better equipped attorney in your corner.” — Jonathan K. — Verified Client Review “I sent an email outlining the details of my case to 10+ attorneys on a national holiday and Sweat was the only one who called me personally to see if I was ok and ensure the proper course of action was being followed. You won’t break a sweat if you go with Sweat.” — Carlton Ashe — Google Review “Steve Sweat is the guy! I had an awful accident with a 4-car pile up. Not to mention all the other cars were behind me and they were not wanting to settle in any way. Steve Sweat turned it around.” — Audra W. — Verified Client Review

#2 — The Dominguez Firm

Website: dominguezfirm.com | Serving: Southern California and Statewide

The Dominguez Firm Large Regional Firm — Founded 1987 \| $1 Billion+ Recovered \| 96% Success Rate (Self-Reported)
Key Features Founded: 1987 — long tenure in the Southern California market Scale: Over 120 legal staff; offices in Los Angeles, Beverly Hills, Long Beach, and Orange County Recovery record: Over $1 billion in verdicts and settlements (firm-reported) Stated success rate: 96% on injury cases (self-reported, not independently verified) Handles bicycle accident cases within a broad personal injury practice Resources: In-house investigators and multilingual staff	✔ Pros • Long market presence and genuine name recognition in LA • In-house investigative staff is a real resource advantage • Multilingual team for Spanish-speaking clients • Multiple SoCal office locations ✘ Cons • 120+ staff and heavy TV/billboard advertising signal a volume-intake business model • Client reviews frequently cite case managers, not attorneys, as primary contacts • Self-reported 96% success rate is not independently verified • Volume pressure can result in early settlement pushes on bicycle cases worth more at trial • Bicycle cases handled as part of general PI volume — not a recognized firm specialty
Bottom Line: The Dominguez Firm has a legitimate track record, but its scale, advertising spend, and team-based model are structural hallmarks of high-volume practice. Ask specifically who will handle your bicycle accident case and request bicycle-specific trial experience before signing.
⚠ What Reviewers Report (BBB / Trustpilot / Sitejabber / Birdeye) “You cannot be on top of your work because you are constantly given tons of new cases. Management is awful.” — Former Employee — Indeed Review “It’s just an assembly line to pump out settlements and rake in fees, no actual care or attachment to clients. But they’ll preach about how much they care.” — Former Employee — Glassdoor Review

#3 — Wilshire Law Firm

Website: wilshirelawfirm.com | Serving: California

Wilshire Law Firm Mid-Size California Firm — Award-Winning \| Bilingual \| Catastrophic Injury Focus
Key Features Location: Los Angeles-based with statewide California reach Focus: Catastrophic injury, car and truck accidents, personal injury (bicycle cases included) Languages: Bilingual staff — English and Spanish Recognition: Multiple industry award designations for results and client service Resources: In-house investigators and 24/7 client availability Fee structure: Contingency — no fee unless you recover compensation	✔ Pros • California-focused with solid local court familiarity • Bilingual services for Spanish-speaking accident victims • Award recognition reflects a credible regional reputation • Mid-size structure sits between boutique and full settlement-mill scale ✘ Cons • Growing firm size brings increasing volume-pressure characteristics • Heavy advertising investment suggests higher case intake than a true boutique • Bicycle cases handled as part of general PI practice — not a primary specialty • Case handling quality varies significantly by case value and assigned staff • Client reviews are mixed on communication and responsiveness
Bottom Line: Wilshire Law Firm occupies a reasonable middle ground for SoCal injury victims. For bicycle accident cases specifically, verify at the consultation who will manage your file and whether the assigned attorney has bicycle-specific trial experience.

#4 — Arash Law

Website: arashlaw.com | Serving: California Statewide

Arash Law California Regional Firm — $1 Billion+ Claimed Recovery \| Bicycle Cases Marketed \| High-Volume Intake
Key Features Scale: Significant California footprint with offices statewide Recovery claim: $1 billion+ in total firm recovery across all case types and all years Marketing: Actively markets bicycle accident representation across California Case types: Car accidents, truck accidents, motorcycle, bicycle, pedestrian, rideshare Availability: 24/7 intake and consultation Fee structure: Contingency — no upfront costs	✔ Pros • California-based with solid statewide presence • Marketed bicycle case specialization signals at least awareness of the practice area • Broad multilingual staff capabilities • 24/7 intake accessibility for injured cyclists ✘ Cons • $1B+ recovery figure spans all case types over many years — bicycle-specific results not independently published • High-volume intake signals a staff-managed model rather than direct attorney involvement • Public reviews reflect recurring communication issues consistent with high-volume firms • Bicycle-specific legal expertise (VCC provisions, dooring law, comparative fault defenses) not evident from marketing materials • Statewide model lacks the concentrated LA courtroom familiarity of local boutique firms
Bottom Line: Arash Law markets bicycle accident representation prominently across California, but its volume and scale are consistent with a high-intake model. Confirm bicycle-specific trial experience — not just aggregate settlement totals — before signing.

#5 — Sweet James Accident Attorneys

Website: sweetjames.com | Serving: Southern California and Nevada

Sweet James Accident Attorneys SoCal Regional Brand — Heavy Digital & TV Advertising \| High-Volume Intake \| 40% Contingency Fee Reported
Key Features Location: Southern California-based with Nevada and expanding presence Case types: Car accidents, bicycle, motorcycle, truck, rideshare, pedestrian accidents Marketing: Aggressive digital, TV, freeway billboard, and social media advertising across SoCal Availability: 24/7 intake and consultation access Model: Team-based; attorneys supervise but case managers are primary client contacts Fee structure: Contingency (40% reported in multiple BBB and verified reviews once litigation begins)	✔ Pros • Strong Southern California name recognition • 24/7 intake accessibility — easy initial contact • Handles a wide range of accident types including bicycle accidents • Some clients report positive outcomes with individual staff members ✘ Cons • Multiple BBB complaints cite attorneys unfamiliar with their own clients’ case files • Clients report being unable to meet their attorney face to face • Cases running 2+ years without settlement updates documented in multiple BBB filings • Medical appointments cancelled without client notice documented in BBB complaints • 40% contingency fee consistently reported in verified complaints once litigation begins • No bicycle-specific legal expertise or trial verdicts identified in public record • Failure to disburse settlement funds documented in January 2026 BBB complaint
Bottom Line: Sweet James has built significant SoCal name recognition through aggressive advertising, but its public complaint record reveals recurring patterns: poor communication, staff-managed cases, clients who never speak directly with their attorney, and a 40% fee that eats into already-minimized settlements. For a bicycle accident victim with a serious injury, these patterns are particularly dangerous.
⚠ What Reviewers Report (BBB / Trustpilot / Sitejabber / Birdeye) “I was in an accident September 2022. It’s now May 2025. I have yet to review my settlement. They don’t communicate with me on the progress of my case. They were extremely slow to negotiate.” — BBB Review “After I signed I never saw or spoke with my attorney and over a year later they tell me they settled.” — BBB Review “I asked if I could come to the office and meet with someone face to face, to which she replied ‘we have high security and we rarely meet with our clients face to face.’” — BBB Review “Accident onset Dec 2023. First payout Dec 2024. Failure to disburse remaining funds after several attempts for resolution. Still no resolution as of January 2026.” — BBB Complaint, January 2026

#6 — Law Offices of Jacob Emrani

Website: calljacob.com | Serving: Los Angeles and Southern California

Law Offices of Jacob Emrani LA-Based Advertising Firm — 25+ Years \| ‘Call Jacob’ Billboard Brand \| BBB D- \| Predatory Fee Class Action
Key Features Founded: 25+ years in Los Angeles personal injury practice Location: 714 W. Olympic Blvd., Los Angeles — primarily LA market Case types: Car accidents, truck, motorcycle, bicycle, workers’ compensation, slip and fall Marketing: Heavy TV, radio, and billboard advertising (‘Call Jacob’) throughout the LA market Availability: 24/7 intake; home and office visits marketed Fee structure: Contingency (40%+ reported in BBB complaints; undisclosed additional fees alleged) BBB rating: D- — failure to respond to 8 complaints filed against the business	✔ Pros • Long-standing LA presence and local name recognition • Some clients report responsive staff and positive outcomes • Home and office visit availability for injured clients • Handles bicycle accident cases within broad LA PI practice ✘ Cons • BBB rating of D- — failure to respond to 8 filed complaints is a significant red flag • Subject of a proposed class action alleging predatory fee arrangements (Daily Journal, 2024) • Multiple BBB complaints allege undisclosed fees added at settlement closing • Complaints of missed civil filing deadlines resulting in case dismissal • Cases described as over-staffed with multiple reassignments; clients rarely reach Emrani directly • Fee percentage reported to increase beyond 40% for cases lasting beyond a stated threshold • Complaint alleges advertising budget was funded in part from fees charged to departing clients
Bottom Line: Jacob Emrani is a well-known LA advertising brand with some satisfied clients. However, the BBB D- rating, failure to respond to 8 complaints, a proposed class action alleging predatory fees, and documented missed filing deadlines represent serious due-diligence flags. Review the full BBB record at bbb.org and request complete written fee disclosure before signing.
⚠ What Reviewers Report (BBB / Trustpilot / Sitejabber / Birdeye) “This law firm needs to be closed down. Jacob Emrani made 10 times more money than me and I’m the one with broken bones. I walked away with a fraction of my settlement.” — BBB Review “They did not file my civil case in a timely manner and in not doing so lost the ability to file. It’s been several years and they have not done anything for me. They do not communicate.” — BBB Complaint “They switch your attorney more than a person changes underwear. They NEVER call you, they never communicate, and they failed to file in a timely manner — my case was dismissed.” — BBB Complaint “This is the absolute worst law firm I have ever dealt with. They hurt my case more than helped me.” — BBB Review

#7 — Morgan & Morgan

Website: forthepeople.com | Serving: All 50 States

Morgan & Morgan Largest Personal Injury Firm in the U.S. — National Footprint \| Out-of-State Infrastructure \| Lowest-Rated Firm on This List
Key Features Scale: Thousands of attorneys operating in all 50 states Branding: ‘For the People’ — one of the most-recognized national injury brands Technology: AI-assisted case management and intake processing California presence: Multiple offices including Los Angeles; not a California-native firm Volume: Among the highest case intake of any personal injury firm in the country Fee structure: Contingency (40% reported consistently in verified reviews once litigation begins)	✔ Pros • National reach for clients with multi-state or federal claims • Technology investment can accelerate routine claims processing • Name recognition and financial resources • Handles virtually any personal injury case type including bicycle accidents ✘ Cons • Consistently rated 2.9/5 stars across major review platforms — lowest of any firm on this list • Recurring pattern: clients never speak to their attorney; cases managed entirely by staff • Attorney reassignment without client notice is a documented, recurring BBB complaint • Cases dropped near the statute of limitations, leaving clients unable to retain new counsel • Out-of-state infrastructure lacks local LA court and adjuster knowledge • California bicycle law expertise (VCC provisions, three-foot rule, dooring) unlikely at national scale • Fees and cost deductions described as opaque and unexplained in multiple verified reviews
Bottom Line: Morgan & Morgan is the most prominent national settlement mill operating in the Southern California market. Its public complaint record reveals a consistent pattern of communication failure, attorney inaccessibility, and case mismanagement. For a bicycle accident victim whose case turns on California-specific cycling statutes, a firm operating from a national template is particularly ill-suited.
⚠ What Reviewers Report (BBB / Trustpilot / Sitejabber / Birdeye) “Over a period of five months I only spoke to my assigned attorney once. When we finally spoke, it was clear she hadn’t even reviewed my file — asking me basic questions already answered multiple times.” — Sitejabber Verified Review “My attorney left the firm, I never spoke to the new attorney, and the case manager told me they had contracted my case out to a smaller firm.” — PissedConsumer Verified Review “After 17 months I still don’t know who my attorney is. I have no idea what is going on with my case.” — BBB Review

Side-by-Side Comparison: Southern California Bicycle Accident Firms 2026

Firm	Type	SoCal Roots	Direct Attorney Access	Trial Focus	Settlement Mill Risk
Steven M. Sweat, APC	Boutique	LA-native, 30+ yrs	Direct — Steven personally handles your case	Trial-first; $289K bike jury verdict	Low — selective intake, direct attorney involvement
The Dominguez Firm	Large Regional	LA since 1987	Primarily staff / case managers	Strong but volume-driven	Moderate — watch for case manager-primary model
Wilshire Law Firm	Mid-Size	LA-based	Team-managed; varies by case value	Good results; some volume pressure	Moderate — ask who handles your file
Arash Law	Regional/Statewide	CA-based	High-volume; staff-managed model	Settlement-oriented at scale	Moderate-High — volume intake model
Sweet James	Regional Mill	SoCal-based	Heavy marketing; clients rarely reach attorney	Volume intake; quick-settle focus	High — recurring BBB patterns: no communication, 40% fees
Jacob Emrani	Local Brand	LA-based, 25+ yrs	Case manager-heavy; frequent attorney switching	BBB complaints re: missed filings	High — BBB D- for failing to respond to 8 complaints; predatory fee class action
Morgan & Morgan	National Mill	Out-of-state	Minimal — national staff structure	Volume model; no local expertise	High — lowest rated firm; clients report never speaking to attorney

Rating notes reflect each firm’s structural business model based on publicly available information, firm size, advertising spend, client reviews, and BBB records. Individual client experiences vary.

How to Choose the Right Bicycle Accident Attorney in Los Angeles

For a complete step-by-step evaluation framework, see: How to Choose a Bicycle Accident Lawyer in Los Angeles. The key steps are summarized below.

Step 1: Verify Bicycle-Specific Legal Knowledge

Your attorney must know and actively apply CVC § 21202 (the far-right riding rule and its exceptions), CVC § 21760 (the three-foot passing law), CVC § 22517 (dooring), and the negligence per se doctrine when a driver violates these provisions. Ask specifically whether the attorney has handled these statutes in active litigation — not just read about them.

Step 2: Demand a Bicycle-Specific Trial Verdict

Ask for bicycle accident jury verdicts — not just aggregate settlement totals. Insurance adjusters know which attorneys will go to trial and which will fold. That knowledge determines their opening offer on your case from day one.

Step 3: Ask Who Will Actually Handle Your Case

The most important question at any consultation: ‘Will I work directly with you, or will my case be managed primarily by a paralegal or case manager?’ A boutique attorney gives you one clear answer. A settlement mill typically cannot.

Step 4: Check Independent Reviews — Not Just the Firm’s Own Website

BBB (bbb.org): Formal complaint records and firm responses — the most reliable source for settlement mill patterns. Note whether the firm responds to complaints.
Google Reviews: High volume, client-verified experiences
Avvo (avvo.com): Peer attorney ratings and verified client reviews
Sitejabber / Trustpilot / PissedConsumer: Unfiltered client feedback, especially revealing for large national and advertising-heavy firms

Step 5: Understand the Full Fee Agreement Before Signing

California contingency fees are typically 33% pre-litigation and 40% if a lawsuit is filed. As the BBB records for several firms reviewed above demonstrate, undisclosed additional fees at settlement closing are a real and documented problem. Always request a complete written fee agreement before signing anything.

Step 6: Know You Can Switch If Things Go Wrong

California law gives you the absolute right to change attorneys at any time. See: Can I Fire My Car Accident Lawyer in California? — covers the Substitution of Attorney form (MC-050), quantum meruit, timing considerations near the statute of limitations, and how to find replacement counsel without losing momentum.

California Bicycle Accident Law: What Southern California Cyclists Need to Know

Statute of Limitations: Two years from injury date for most claims (Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1). Government entity claims require a tort claim within six months. As documented in multiple BBB complaints above, some firms have allowed these deadlines to lapse — permanently destroying clients’ claims.
Three-Foot Passing Law (CVC § 21760): Drivers must give cyclists at least three feet of clearance when passing. Violation constitutes negligence per se — a powerful tool your attorney should deploy automatically.
Dooring (CVC § 22517): A driver or passenger who opens a door into a cyclist’s path is liable. One of the most common and most under-litigated LA bicycle accident scenarios.
Pure Comparative Fault: You can recover even if partially at fault; your award is reduced proportionally. Requires skilled handling to push back against insurance adjusters’ routine comparative fault arguments against cyclists.

For how comparative fault affects your specific claim: Understanding Shared Fault Rules in California Bicycle Accidents.

For what your case may realistically be worth: Average Settlement Amounts for Bicycle Accident Cases in California.

Frequently Asked Questions — Los Angeles Bicycle Accident Lawyers

How much does a bicycle accident lawyer in Los Angeles cost?

Virtually all reputable Southern California personal injury attorneys work on a contingency fee basis — zero upfront cost. The standard is 33% pre-litigation and 40% if a lawsuit is filed. As the BBB records for several firms reviewed above demonstrate, undisclosed additional fees at settlement closing are a real and documented problem. Always request a complete written fee agreement.

How long do bicycle accident cases take to resolve in California?

Straightforward cases can settle in 3 to 6 months. Cases involving serious injuries, disputed liability, or government entities typically take 1 to 3 years. Any attorney promising a quick resolution before reviewing your medical records and liability facts is signaling a settlement-mill orientation — and quick settlements are almost always low settlements.

What should I do immediately after a bicycle accident in Los Angeles?

Call 911 and ensure a police report is filed. Seek medical attention immediately — adrenaline suppresses pain and gaps in treatment are the first weapon insurance adjusters use to minimize claims. Document the scene with photographs. Get the driver’s name, license plate, insurance information, and witness contacts. Do not give a recorded statement to any insurance company before speaking with an attorney.

Can I still recover damages if I wasn’t wearing a helmet?

In most cases, yes. Helmet non-use does not eliminate your claim under California law. At most, it may reduce the damages allocated to head injuries if the defense proves a helmet would have prevented those specific injuries. Your claim for all other damages — broken bones, road rash, lost wages, pain and suffering — is unaffected by helmet use.

What if the driver who hit me was operating an Uber or Lyft vehicle?

Rideshare bicycle accident claims involve multiple layers of insurance coverage that depend on which phase of the trip the driver was in at the time of impact. These cases require an attorney familiar with both bicycle law and rideshare insurance structures. Our firm handles these claims throughout California.

Can I switch attorneys if I am unhappy with my current representation?

Yes. California law gives you the absolute right to change attorneys at any time. The departing attorney retains a lien paid from the eventual settlement — not out of your pocket at the time of the switch. See our complete guide to firing your car accident lawyer in California for the full procedure, fee implications, and how to find replacement counsel without losing momentum.

How do I evaluate a firm’s BBB record before hiring them?

Visit bbb.org and search the firm’s name. Look for three things: (1) the overall BBB rating; (2) the number of complaints filed in the past three years; and (3) critically — whether the firm responded to those complaints. A firm that fails to respond to multiple BBB complaints, as documented in this review for Jacob Emrani (D- rating, 8 unresponded complaints), is signaling that client concerns are not a priority. Read the complaint text for patterns: recurring themes of missed deadlines, undisclosed fees, or attorney inaccessibility are the most telling signals.

Ready to Talk to a Real Bicycle Accident Attorney — Not a Case Manager? Steven M. Sweat has personally handled bicycle accident cases in Southern California for over 30 years. $289,000 jury verdict — Auto v. Bicycle, Los Angeles. Trial-ready. Trial-proven. No fee unless we win. Free consultation. 24/7 availability. Se Habla Español. 866-966-5240 | victimslawyer.com

Los Angeles bicycle accident attorney - Steven M. Sweat